Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to political goals and calls for action against them.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but it does use strong language ('harrowing description', 'fundamental extremist goals') which could be seen as inflammatory. However, it does not cross into harmful rhetoric.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on political goals rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and action against what it perceives as harmful political goals. However, the use of strong language may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents a one-sided view and does not invite discussion or debate. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to mobilize action against a political agenda, which can be seen as an attempt to better society according to the speaker's values. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express concerns about political issues responsibly, though the strong language could be toned down for more balanced discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.