The statement suggests that conservative leaders should be compelled to watch clips of Pierre Poilevre and take notes, implying that his approach or ideas are exemplary. The tone is somewhat forceful and prescriptive, and it includes a link to a website, which could be seen as promotional.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the forceful language could be seen as dismissive of differing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the forceful tone could be seen as disrespectful to those who disagree. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more prescriptive and one-sided. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it prescribes a course of action without room for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as using the platform in a somewhat irresponsible manner due to its prescriptive nature.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.