Brian Krassenstein
@krassenstein
·
394d
The statement 'Not a coincidence' in the context of the conversation about earnings transparency and perceived bias on the platform X constitutes public discourse. It touches on issues of fairness, transparency, and potential political bias in social media earnings and engagement metrics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a potential bias that could be harmful if not substantiated. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. This is neutral.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather implies a conclusion without detailed evidence. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a potential issue of fairness, which can be seen as a positive use of influence. This is a minor alignment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but should be made responsibly with supporting evidence. This is neutral.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.