Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is highly charged and accusatory, using strong language to criticize the actions of the White House and to rally support for a cause. It addresses a significant public issue, namely the conflict involving Palestine, and calls for action against what it describes as genocide. The tone is confrontational and the intent is to mobilize public opinion and action against the current administration's policies.
- The statement uses inflammatory language ('war criminals') which can be seen as harmful and does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others by labeling individuals as 'war criminals,' which can be seen as a form of harassment. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses divisive language. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks ('war criminals') and does not foster a productive conversation. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to mobilize people for a cause, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment, but the aggressive tone undermines this. (+1 point)Â [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that lacks responsibility and integrity due to its inflammatory and accusatory nature. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.