Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 7

The statement is a brief report on a public protest in Los Angeles, demanding action from President Biden regarding the situation in Palestine. The tone is urgent and the intent is to inform and possibly mobilize public opinion on a significant geopolitical issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the term 'genocide' is highly charged and could be seen as inflammatory. This could potentially escalate tensions rather than promote calm discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by focusing on a public event and a political issue.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting a protest against perceived injustices. However, the use of the term 'genocide' could polarize opinions rather than foster compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on a political demand rather than attacking individuals.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a significant issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment by encouraging public engagement and awareness.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform to address a public concern. However, the charged language could be seen as lacking in responsible use of the platform.