In reply to:
The statement by @harrisonjaime and the reply both engage in a discussion about a public issue, specifically the framing of innocent men of color and the credibility of the information being broadcast by the DNC. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses societal concerns and public figures.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, but it does accuse the DNC of dishonesty, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more accusatory in nature. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the DNC but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue at hand. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue. However, the tone could be more responsible and less accusatory. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.