Jill Stien

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 21

The statement is a public discourse as it engages with significant public issues, specifically U.S. foreign policy, Israeli-Palestinian relations, and broader themes of empire, fascism, and oligarchy. The tone is assertive and calls for collective action against perceived injustices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('genocide') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially inciting anger or hostility. This could be considered a violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the use of the term 'genocide' could be seen as disrespectful and inflammatory, potentially undermining the dignity of those it criticizes. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the Palestinian cause, but the aggressive tone may hinder constructive dialogue and mutual understanding.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does use strong, polarizing language that may not foster constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for a cause they believe will better society, specifically the Palestinian cause and opposition to perceived injustices. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a strong political stance, though the responsibility and integrity of the language used can be questioned. [+1]