Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing political issues related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The tone is critical and accusatory, particularly towards Israel and U.S. political figures. The statement highlights Dr. Jill Stein's attendance at a Palestinian wedding, which is used as a segue into a broader political critique.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language ('war criminal state') that could be inflammatory and harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly those it accuses of being war criminals. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a manner that could be seen as divisive rather than for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, given its accusatory and inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.