The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to the ethical conduct of U.S. Supreme Court Justices and proposes a specific policy change.
- Principle 1: I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It focuses on a policy proposal rather than personal attacks. [+1]
- Principle 2: I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
- Principle 3: I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement promotes understanding of a specific ethical concern regarding gifts to Supreme Court Justices. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate in its tone. 
- Principle 4: I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a policy issue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
- Principle 6: I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change that could benefit society by promoting ethical standards. [+1]
- Principle 7: I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+1]