The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with a public health issue, specifically the EU's procurement of avian flu vaccines. The tone is critical and raises concerns about the safety and necessity of the vaccine.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm from an untested vaccine, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the language used ('guinea pigs') could be seen as inflammatory and may cause unnecessary fear.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of the term 'guinea pigs' could be seen as disrespectful to those who may receive the vaccine. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses alarmist language that may incite fear rather than informed discussion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong assertion without providing a balanced view or inviting discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, given the alarmist tone and lack of balanced information. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.