Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Elizabeth Warren
@ewarren
·
143d
The statement is a critical response to a public figure's comment on political party values, specifically addressing the issue of U.S. foreign policy and its impact on Palestinian children. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, suggesting hypocrisy in the Democratic Party's stance on children's welfare.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language that could incite anger or hostility, thus violating this principle. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the individuals it criticizes, thus partially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses accusatory language that may polarize rather than unite, thus violating this principle. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a personal attack on the Democratic Party, thus violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight a perceived injustice, which aligns with this principle, but the confrontational tone undermines its effectiveness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, thus partially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.