Jill Stien

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 60

The statement addresses a significant public issue concerning environmental safety and government transparency. It expresses strong criticism of the EPA's handling of toxic contamination following a train derailment, suggesting a failure to notify the public about the presence of a dangerous substance. The tone is accusatory and aims to hold the EPA accountable for its actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a potential harm caused by the EPA's actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by bringing attention to a public health issue. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the actions of an organization rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by informing the public about a potential health risk, although its accusatory tone may limit its effectiveness in fostering compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the EPA, but its accusatory tone could be seen as a personal attack on the organization, which slightly detracts from constructive dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for public awareness and government accountability, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment. [+2]