In reply to:
Cosmic Earth 🇵🇸🕊️🌍🌲🔮🏳️🌈
@gallixsee
·
140d
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
140d
The statement and the preceding conversation involve a discussion about political figures and potential collaboration, which can be considered public discourse as it touches on political engagement and potential policy-making. The tone is positive and supportive, encouraging collaboration and expressing enthusiasm for political figures.
- The statement does no harm and is supportive, aligning well with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging collaboration and expressing support for political figures, aligning well with the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by suggesting a potential collaboration and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, aligning well with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.