The statement 'Safe. Effective. Legal.' in response to the Supreme Court's decision to preserve access to the abortion medication mifepristone constitutes public discourse. It engages with a significant public issue—abortion rights and access to medication—by providing a succinct opinion on the matter.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a factual assertion that supports the safety, effectiveness, and legality of the medication, which can be seen as a positive contribution to the discourse. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by emphasizing the safety, effectiveness, and legality of the medication, which can foster empathy and compassion for those who need it. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the medication and the legal decision rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing a clear, factual opinion on a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.