Miranda Devine
@mirandadevine
·
607d
The statement criticizes The New York Times for allegedly misrepresenting the validity of Miranda Devine's reporting and calls for an apology. The tone is accusatory and defensive, aiming to defend the credibility of Devine's work while discrediting The New York Times.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language like 'liars' and 'almost actionable,' which can be seen as harmful and inflammatory. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in name-calling and harsh criticism. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is confrontational and accusatory. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to challenge a major news outlet, which can be seen as an attempt to hold it accountable, but the approach is not constructive.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.