Jill Stien

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 24

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by critiquing the perceived similarities between Democratic and Republican policies, particularly on the issue of border control. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight a perceived hypocrisy or inconsistency in political actions and rhetoric.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and image do not appear to cause direct harm but could contribute to political polarization by framing the issue in a divisive manner. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement and image respect the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing on political actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The content does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement and image engage in criticism but do not engage in constructive dialogue or offer solutions. [-1]