Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47

Score 29

-2

I speak and read Russian. Putin’s government is as full of shit as Zelensky’s and “KGB talking points” are comical. I also lived in the region, know Ukraine can’t win, and don’t want to join a proxy war with a nuclear power. That’s not Russian propaganda talking but my opinion.

Eli

@EliStrawmaning

606d

@mtaibbi If you are repeating KGB talking points. What would you call that? You types have zero self awareness about Russia’s propaganda and strategy. You carry yourselves like it doesn’t exist at all.

6/13/2024, 9:38:34 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the complex geopolitical issue of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and expressing a personal opinion on the matter. The tone is assertive and dismissive of both Russian and Ukrainian governments, while also rejecting the notion of being influenced by Russian propaganda.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly promote harm, but the dismissive language towards both governments and the conflict could be seen as insensitive to those affected by the war. This partially violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy of individuals but engages in a dismissive manner towards the governments involved. It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those involved in the conflict.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a firm stance and dismisses the perspectives of others, which could hinder constructive dialogue. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by expressing a personal opinion on the conflict. However, the dismissive tone and strong language towards others' viewpoints could be seen as bordering on personal attacks, which partially violates this principle. [-1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses the platform to express a personal opinion on a significant geopolitical issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society by contributing to public discourse. However, the dismissive tone may undermine this positive aspect. [+1]