The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the efforts to stop the flow of fentanyl at the border, and criticizes political opponents, thus it constitutes public discourse.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone which could be seen as divisive.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does include a personal attack on Mike Johnson.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticizing political opponents.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in personal attacks, specifically targeting Mike Johnson, which is not constructive criticism.
[-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to highlight actions taken by California but does so in a way that could be seen as divisive rather than unifying.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its confrontational tone and personal attacks.
[-1]