The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the efforts to stop the flow of fentanyl at the border, and criticizes political opponents, thus it constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone which could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does include a personal attack on Mike Johnson.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticizing political opponents. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks, specifically targeting Mike Johnson, which is not constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight actions taken by California but does so in a way that could be seen as divisive rather than unifying.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its confrontational tone and personal attacks. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.