The statement appears to be a call to action, urging people to oppose certain individuals or ideas. It suggests that violent reactions to the argument will validate the point being made. The tone is confrontational and implies that opposition is necessary, potentially inciting conflict.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it implies that violence may be a justified reaction, which can incite harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it implicitly encourages opposition that could lead to harassment or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is confrontational and divisive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it suggests that violent reactions will prove the point, which is not conducive to healthy debate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly; it risks inciting violence and does not uphold the principles of free speech with integrity. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.