In reply to:
Wall Street Apes
@WallStreetApes
·
581d
The statement criticizes the U.S. government's partnership with Ukraine, suggesting it leads to corruption and self-serving behavior among politicians. The tone is accusatory and cynical, aiming to highlight perceived corruption and misuse of public funds.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses inflammatory language ('swine in Congress') which can be harmful and divisive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in derogatory language and could be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight issues of corruption, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but the approach is not constructive. (+1 point) [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.