The statement 'You literally just voted against protecting IVF yesterday.' is a direct response to a public figure's claim about their stance on IVF. It engages with a public issue (IVF protection) and challenges the consistency of the public figure's actions, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a factual assertion.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence. It could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to hold a public figure accountable, which can be seen as contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to challenge a public figure's actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.