The statement 'You literally just voted against protecting IVF yesterday.' is a direct response to a public figure's claim about their stance on IVF. It engages with a public issue (IVF protection) and challenges the consistency of the public figure's actions, thus constituting public discourse.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as confrontational.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a factual assertion.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is accusatory in nature.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence. It could be seen as a personal attack.
[-1]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to hold a public figure accountable, which can be seen as contributing to societal betterment.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to challenge a public figure's actions.
[+1]