Jill Stien

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 49

The statement addresses a highly contentious and sensitive public issue, namely the actions of Israel in a conflict context. It implies a call to action and suggests a political solution, which makes it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('murder,' 'massacres') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than calming them. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it broadly accuses a nation of committing severe crimes without distinguishing between the actions of a government and its people. This could be seen as a form of hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and inflammatory language that could deepen divisions. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad accusations without offering a nuanced discussion or engaging with opposing viewpoints, which can be seen as a form of personal attack against a nation. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to call for political action, which could be seen as using influence for societal change. However, the manner in which it does so is highly contentious and could be seen as divisive rather than unifying.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given its inflammatory and accusatory nature. [-1]