Reposted by Matt Taibbi
KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat
·
604d
The statement and the accompanying conversation discuss the oversight and subsequent dismantling of the Stanford Internet Observatory, which is a public issue related to misinformation, election integrity, and government oversight. The tone is assertive and celebratory, indicating a perceived victory in the realm of public accountability and transparency.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as polarizing depending on one's stance on the issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the actions taken by the oversight committee, though it may lack empathy for those who support the Observatory's work.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Stanford Internet Observatory's role in misinformation and election integrity, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight government oversight and accountability, which can be seen as a positive use of influence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by discussing a public issue and the actions taken by public officials, doing so responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.