In reply to:
Lysergicaciddiet
@JoshuaH18955148
·
602d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
602d
The statement in question is part of a broader conversation that involves public figures and their journalistic integrity, which is a matter of public concern. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse. The tone of the statement is inquisitive and somewhat critical, questioning the originality of the reporting done by Briahna Joy Gray.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It questions the originality of the reporting, which is a valid critique in journalism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It remains focused on the professional work of the individual rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critiquing the work.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the originality of the reporting. It does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to question journalistic integrity, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.