The statement and the surrounding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with issues of media ethics, professional conduct, and public accountability. The tone is accusatory and critical, focusing on the behavior and professional actions of a public figure.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is accusatory and could be seen as harmful to the individual's reputation (-2 points). [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in a form of public shaming, which can be seen as a form of harassment (-2 points). [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism and blame (-2 points). [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and dialogue; it includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments (-2 points). [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no acknowledgment or correction of mistakes in the statement (-1 point). [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- While the statement upholds the principle of free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity (-1 point). [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.