In reply to:
Savage Joy Marie-Mostly blind, but aware AF-Mann
@SavageJoyMarie1
·
133d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing a significant political issue: the suspension of military aid to Israel, as called for by a third-party US presidential candidate. The conversation includes expressions of support and acknowledgment of the candidate's consistent stance on the issue.
- The statement and conversation do not appear to cause harm and are respectful in tone, thus adhering to the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the candidate's consistent stance on a significant issue, which can foster informed dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing a significant political issue and acknowledging a candidate's stance, the conversation uses its influence to contribute to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.