Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47

Score 29

-3

She’s saying I used “selective framing” from “selective document disclosure”to say “government influence was all *pro-vax* misinformation from libs targeting conservative-leaning skeptics” — and that reading my reports can make you an “unwitting tool of misinformation yourself.”

Kael

@KaelFischer

600d

@LordDSofCanada @mtaibbi What was the lie, in that post. She seems cagey and throws shade generally around, but I didn't notice the lie.

6/15/2024, 5:54:37 PM

The statement and the surrounding conversation engage in a substantive discussion about the interpretation of government documents and the influence of government actions on public perception, particularly regarding COVID-19 vaccines. The discourse involves accusations of misinformation and selective framing, which are significant public issues. The tone is contentious, with participants questioning the accuracy and intent behind the shared information.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement and the conversation do not appear to intentionally cause harm, but the contentious nature and accusations could contribute to public confusion and mistrust, which might indirectly cause harm. Minor violation. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The conversation involves public figures and public issues, so privacy is not a primary concern. However, the dignity of others is challenged through accusations of lying and misinformation. Minor violation. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on accusations and defensive responses. Significant violation. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The dialogue is not constructive and involves personal attacks, such as calling someone a liar. Significant violation. [-2]
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
There is no acknowledgment or correction of mistakes within the provided conversation. Neutral.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The influence of the participants is used to challenge and question public narratives, which can be seen as an attempt to hold authorities accountable. However, the approach lacks responsibility and integrity due to the accusatory tone. Minor alignment. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The conversation upholds free speech but does so in a manner that could be more responsible and constructive. Minor alignment. [+1]