Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 29
6/15/2024, 9:01:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Virginia Project
@ProjectVirginia
路
599d
@mtaibbi Matt, I ran an auto-blocker script on the Demcast/Occupy Democrats spambot networks a couple of years ago.

Here's what the accounts you've been responding to look like to me
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
路
599d
Joe Biden to you is the left? And is he saving us from deadly stupidity? He can鈥檛 operate silverware
Ned Lewis 馃挋
@NedLewis4real
路
599d
@mtaibbi It figures. You seem all to eager to conflate the right and the left, when at this point in history, only the left can save us from deadly stupidity.

The statement 'Huh. Maybe I should use that?' is a response to a conversation about using an auto-blocker script to manage interactions with certain accounts on social media. The conversation involves discussions about political affiliations and the use of technology to filter interactions. The tone of the statement is neutral and inquisitive, indicating a consideration of using the suggested tool.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, neither promoting nor discouraging any harmful actions. It aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It aligns with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values. It is neutral in this regard.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is neutral in this regard.