Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47

Score 35

-7

What threatening letter? I asked very politely for an apology. I didn’t go to her boss, but to her. She ignored it, which is totally unprofessional, and lied bout it on air, also unprofessional. Now she’s supposed to be a victim? Give me a break.

Jonathan Kadmon

@JonathanKadmon

598d

@mtaibbi Matt you sent a threatening letter months ago (which got ignored), wrote an intro to an old piece saying explicitly she should have been fired, and then delusionally tried to claim credit for playing a part in it in the above tweets I cited.

6/16/2024, 3:25:19 AM

The statement and the surrounding conversation involve a public debate about professional conduct, accusations of unprofessional behavior, and the ethics of calling for someone's firing. The tone is defensive and accusatory, with both parties asserting their perspectives on the situation. The statement touches on several principles of public discourse, including respect for privacy and dignity, constructive criticism, and the use of influence.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly threaten harm but does contribute to a hostile environment by accusing the other party of lying and being unprofessional. This can be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement accuses the other party of lying and being unprofessional, which can be seen as a violation of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. This is a significant violation as it publicly questions the other party's professional integrity. [-2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it is defensive and accusatory, which can escalate the conflict rather than resolve it. This is a minor violation of promoting understanding and empathy. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in personal attacks by calling the other party unprofessional and a liar. This is a significant violation of engaging in constructive criticism and avoiding personal attacks. [-2]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses the platform to address a personal grievance rather than for the betterment of society. This is a minor violation of using influence responsibly. [-1]