Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 35
6/16/2024, 4:04:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Amb
@Amb58095516
·
598d
@mtaibbi You two should talk.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
598d
What threatening letter? I asked very politely for an apology. I didn’t go to her boss, but to her. She ignored it, which is totally unprofessional, and lied bout it on air, also unprofessional. Now she’s supposed to be a victim? Give me a break.
Jonathan Kadmon
@JonathanKadmon
·
598d
@mtaibbi Matt you sent a threatening letter months ago (which got ignored), wrote an intro to an old piece saying explicitly she should have been fired, and then delusionally tried to claim credit for playing a part in it in the above tweets I cited.

The statement and the surrounding conversation involve a public dispute between individuals regarding professional conduct and public accountability. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, with participants expressing frustration and defending their actions. The statement in question reflects a sense of being ignored and disrespected, contributing to the overall tension in the discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but contributes to a hostile and confrontational environment, which can be harmful in a broader sense. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy to some extent but does not uphold the dignity of others, as it is part of a public argument that involves personal attacks. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it reflects frustration and anger. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more focused on expressing personal grievances and frustration. [-1]