Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 35
6/16/2024, 4:56:32 AM
X
In reply to:
Tashe
@Tashe28
·
597d
@mtaibbi @Amb58095516 She should. I’m talking about u here. Tbh I expect better from u to not let ur justified personal beef w her negatively polarize u on the issue of whether there’s systemic pro-pal suppression, and if she fell victim to that.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
597d
@Tashe28 @Amb58095516 What’s petty is not apologizing and continuing to take shots at my work. Just apologize and get it over with! Give me one reason she shouldn’t apologize.
Tashe
@Tashe28
·
597d
@mtaibbi @Amb58095516 It’s like ganging up on her & purposely opening up an article critical of her at a time when she’s been fired for unrelated reasons. You don’t see why ppl think this is incredibly petty on ur part?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
597d
@Amb58095516 I suggested this multiple times before all this went public, even suggested ways this could be dealt with quietly. Nothing, no reply. This is why I’m so pissed. It’s totally disrespectful.
Amb
@Amb58095516
·
597d
@mtaibbi You two should talk.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
597d
What threatening letter? I asked very politely for an apology. I didn’t go to her boss, but to her. She ignored it, which is totally unprofessional, and lied bout it on air, also unprofessional. Now she’s supposed to be a victim? Give me a break.

The statement by @Tashe28 constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about professional behavior, workplace dynamics, and the broader issue of systemic suppression. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on the professional conduct of an individual and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is accusatory and could potentially harm the reputation of the individual being discussed. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual; it publicly criticizes and potentially humiliates them. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the broader issue constructively. (-2 points) [-2]