Don Lemon

The statement in question is part of a larger conversation that touches on racial dynamics within religious communities and political events. This conversation can be considered public discourse as it engages with societal issues such as race, religion, and politics.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but the tone of the conversation it is part of could be seen as dismissive or confrontational.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement itself does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the initial comment by @glenmcdaniel ('That's a dumb answer') could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to perpetuate a confrontational tone. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. The initial comment by @glenmcdaniel is a personal attack ('That's a dumb answer'). [-2]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster constructive dialogue.