The statement and accompanying image are critical of certain Democratic members of Congress for their alleged support of a Super PAC that is perceived as trying to influence the ballot. The tone is accusatory and aims to mobilize opposition against these members by suggesting they are undermining democratic processes.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language that could contribute to a polarized environment. This could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement names specific individuals and accuses them of undemocratic behavior, which could be seen as a violation of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but rather seeks to mobilize opposition. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes accusatory claims without providing detailed evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible due to its accusatory and polarizing nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.