Christopher C. Cuomo

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 28

The statement and linked content appear to engage with public issues by suggesting that there is a 'real enemy' that must be opposed, which implies a substantive engagement with societal concerns. The tone is provocative and potentially inflammatory, as it anticipates violent reactions to the argument presented.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement's provocative nature and anticipation of violent reactions could be seen as harmful, potentially inciting conflict rather than promoting peaceful discourse. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not directly engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the anticipation of violent reactions could indirectly contribute to a hostile environment. This is a minor violation of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to create an 'us vs. them' mentality, which is counterproductive to fostering empathy and compassion. This is a significant violation of promoting understanding and compassion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It sets up an adversarial tone and does not encourage open, respectful discussion. This is a significant violation of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement upholds the principle of free speech, its provocative and potentially inflammatory nature suggests a lack of responsibility and integrity in using the platform. This is a minor violation of using the platform responsibly. [-1]