The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in a substantive discussion about journalistic ethics, selective editing, and misinformation, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, reflecting a debate on the integrity of journalism and the impact of media practices on public perception.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but engages in a critical discussion about journalistic practices, which can be seen as a necessary part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on journalistic practices rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by discussing the nuances of journalistic ethics and the difference between selective editing and outright lying. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of journalistic practices, although the tone is somewhat confrontational, it does not resort to personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss important issues related to media integrity and public trust, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.