Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47

Score 48

Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻

Jason Call 🇵🇸 Green Party WA02 JillStein2024 CM

The NV Dems have filed a frivolous injunction to keep the @GreenPartyNV off the ballot

They have sued the NV SoS as well as the NV Greens

But the NV SoS has confirmed not only the volume of signatures but also the distribution

We now have to hire counsel to defend ourselves…

Steve Sebelius

@SteveSebelius

127d

It's official: The once-defunct Nevada Green Party has submitted enough signatures to get access to the ballot. Democrats have filed a lawsuit, saying a review of some of the signatures shows the group didn't get enough. But elections officials disagree. MORE:

6/19/2024, 5:44:07 PM

The statement addresses a public issue concerning the legal and electoral processes in Nevada, specifically the inclusion of the Green Party on the ballot and the subsequent legal actions taken by the Democratic Party. The tone is accusatory and defensive, suggesting that the lawsuit is frivolous and that the Green Party has met the necessary requirements for ballot access. The statement also mentions the need to hire legal counsel to defend against the lawsuit.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('frivolous injunction') that could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy of individuals but criticizes the actions of the Democratic Party and the Secretary of State without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement aims to promote understanding of the Green Party's position and the legal situation, but its accusatory tone may hinder empathy and compassion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead labeling the lawsuit as frivolous without providing detailed evidence or engaging with the opposing viewpoint. [-1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue of public concern, potentially mobilizing support for the Green Party and raising awareness about the legal challenges they face. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principles of free speech by expressing a viewpoint on a public issue, but its tone and language could be more responsible and measured.