Arnaud Bertrand
@RnaudBertrand
·
581d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically critiquing former President Trump's foreign policy and its implications for America and the world. The tone is critical and the intent is to challenge the strategy proposed by Trump's former National Security Advisor, Robert C. O’Brien.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('absurd and terrifying') which could be seen as inflammatory. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques a public figure's policy rather than attacking the individual. Adheres. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes a perspective that advocates for peace, which aligns with promoting understanding and compassion. Adheres. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the policy rather than engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Adheres. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by engaging in a substantive critique of a public policy issue. Adheres. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.