The statement is a hyperbolic and provocative comment suggesting that a pay-per-view event where protestors are fed to Komodo dragons could fund the Green New Deal. The tone is sarcastic and inflammatory, and it appears to be a reaction to a news story about protestors damaging Stonehenge.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. It suggests a violent and harmful scenario, even if meant sarcastically. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others and can be seen as a form of cyberbullying or hate speech against the protestors. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it promotes a violent and extreme reaction. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to a personal attack and an ad hominem argument against the protestors. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement falls under free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity. It promotes violence and does not contribute positively to public discourse. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.