The statement 'Or the move is to get the facts and rationales out there after a true review of all pandemic policies and create something approaching consensus? Otherwise you are only adding to the divide.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of pandemic policies and the societal divide surrounding them. The tone is constructive and seeks to promote understanding and consensus.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a fact-based review and consensus-building, which can help reduce misinformation and societal division. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a thorough review of pandemic policies and aiming for consensus, which can foster a more informed and compassionate public dialogue. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a method to address the issue (reviewing policies and building consensus) rather than attacking individuals. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by advocating for a more informed and united approach to pandemic policies. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by encouraging a fact-based and consensus-driven approach to public health discussions. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.