The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public health issue, specifically the safety of vaccines for infants. The tone is serious and the intent is to raise concerns about vaccine safety and to advocate for governmental attention to the issue.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading fear about vaccines without providing comprehensive evidence. This could lead to vaccine hesitancy, which is harmful to public health. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. (+1 point) [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it could contribute to fear and misunderstanding about vaccines. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue of vaccine safety. (+1 point) [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise a public health concern, which could be seen as an attempt to better society. However, the potential for spreading misinformation about vaccines could undermine this goal. (0 points)Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue. However, the responsibility and integrity of the information shared are questionable due to the potential for spreading misinformation. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.