Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically addressing the actions of a public figure (Rep. Rick Larsen) and the broader issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, labeling the representative as a 'genocider and war criminal' and calling for continuous activism against him.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using inflammatory and potentially defamatory language. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Rep. Rick Larsen by labeling him with severe accusations without providing evidence, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses divisive and accusatory language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to the harsh and accusatory language used. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.