Reposted by Don Lemon
The statement is brief, uses profanity, and includes a link to a website. It does not provide substantive engagement with public issues, debates, or discussions that contribute to civic dialogue. The tone is casual and potentially dismissive, and the use of an emoji suggests a lighthearted or mocking intent. Without additional context or content from the linked website, it is not possible to determine if the statement addresses public issues or policies.
- The use of profanity and a dismissive tone could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, but the impact is minimal without further context. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the casual use of profanity could be seen as lacking respect for dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack depending on the context of 'this dude.'Â [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly or with integrity due to its casual and potentially dismissive nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.