The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with the issue of media representation in political debates and advocate for broader inclusion of candidates. The tone is assertive and critical, aiming to mobilize public action against perceived media bias.
- The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for inclusivity in political debates, which can be seen as a positive action. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, though it uses strong language ('ram down our throats') which could be seen as aggressive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the desire of over 60% of voters for more choices, thus advocating for a more democratic process. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of CNN and the two-party system, though the language used could be less confrontational to avoid personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for a more inclusive political process. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly to advocate for change. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.