Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 48

The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses the topic of voting in a political election, which is a significant public issue. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and dismissive, particularly towards the major party candidates, and it aims to persuade voters to consider the Green Party as a viable option.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the use of the term 'genocidal guys' is inflammatory and could be seen as harmful rhetoric. This partially violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'genocidal guys' is disrespectful and undermines the dignity of others. This partially violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a dismissive tone towards major party candidates and their supporters. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it uses a personal attack by labeling major party candidates as 'genocidal guys.' This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a public issue, but it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity due to the inflammatory language. This partially violates the principle of using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [-1]