Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and linked content involve a public figure (Jill Stein) calling for inclusion in a political debate, which is a substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue. The tone is assertive and challenges the current debate format, aiming to promote a more inclusive political discussion.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a call for inclusion in a debate, which is a standard part of democratic processes. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for a more inclusive debate stage, allowing for a broader range of viewpoints. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the current debate format and calling for inclusion without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a more inclusive and democratic process, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to advocate for a public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.