The statement 'Pro-life' in response to a conversation about the impact of Texas law SB8 on infant and newborn deaths constitutes public discourse. It engages with a significant public issue—abortion laws and their societal impact.
- The statement 'Pro-life' does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the reported increase in infant deaths, which might be perceived as insensitive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the privacy and dignity of those affected by the law.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is a slogan that does not engage with the complexities of the issue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a declarative stance that does not address the points raised in the original tweet. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific viewpoint but does not contribute to the betterment of society by engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster meaningful dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.