The statement proposes specific actions related to public figures and issues, engaging in a substantive discussion about free speech, government transparency, and the criminal justice system. It addresses public concerns and policies, thus constituting public discourse.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the tone could be seen as provocative, especially to those who disagree with the actions proposed. It neither strongly adheres to nor violates this principle.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It adheres to this principle.
[+2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy towards figures like Assange, Snowden, and Ulbricht, but it may not foster compassion towards those who view these figures negatively. It partially adheres to this principle.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on constructive criticism of government actions. It adheres to this principle.
[+2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to advocate for societal changes related to free speech and government transparency, aiming for the betterment of society. It adheres to this principle.
[+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss significant public issues responsibly. It adheres to this principle.
[+2]