The statement addresses a public issue by discussing a lawsuit involving multiple states and a major pharmaceutical company, which contributes to civic dialogue about public health and corporate responsibility. The tone is assertive and suggests a shift in public opinion or legal action against Pfizer.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to public fear or mistrust regarding vaccines. It does not provide evidence or context, which could be seen as irresponsible. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make serious allegations without substantiating them, which could affect the dignity of those involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on highlighting a legal action and suggesting a negative outcome for Pfizer. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or considering opposing perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to the absence of supporting evidence and context. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.