Reposted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
The statement criticizes certain Supreme Court justices for alleged ethical violations and partisan activities, while highlighting the actions of Representatives Raskin and Ocasio-Cortez in demanding accountability. The tone is accusatory and partisan, aiming to draw attention to perceived misconduct and to rally support for the representatives' actions.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language that could contribute to a polarized environment. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of the justices by labeling them as 'right-wing' and implying unethical behavior without due process. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks, as it labels the justices pejoratively. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for accountability, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by upholding ethical standards. Minor alignment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be fully responsible or with integrity, given the accusatory tone. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.