Jill Stien

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 115

The statement and the accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing the actions and strategies of political organizations and their impact on democracy and elections. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the Democratic Party and its allies have shifted away from progressive values and are now part of a 'corporate war machine.' The statement implies that these organizations are undermining democratic processes by targeting third-party candidates.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses strong language like 'corporate war machine' and 'Genocide Joe,' which can be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful.Ā [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in name-calling and harsh criticism of specific individuals and organizations.Ā [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and antagonism.Ā [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than focusing on policy or substantive issues.Ā [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to criticize and call out perceived issues within the Democratic Party and its allies, which can be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion and promote accountability.Ā [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the use of inflammatory language and personal attacks.Ā [-1]